The notes from the library dean, Jaclyn Jacot, are copied here. They are from an email dated 2/21/2021. There was follow-up discussion and email to clarify what Jenni intended. The clarifications are not shown here. Ask Janine or another librarian if interested.
Summary from Jaclyn of Jenni’s directive:
In response of our Program Review, Action Item: We will “develop global, program learning outcomes.”
What Jenni would like to see:
3 – 5, very broad learning outcomes that you can say every student that went through a library workshop could walk away with. Example: If we have a single workshop with a student, the outcome might state:
“Student was introduced to: x, y, z ...
JO input approved by JJ:
- It is acceptable that we may include 1-2 outcomes in a single session
- It’s fine to plan to scaffold our “global outcomes” up through progressively more advanced courses
- Outcomes are assessed in some way
In addition to log of annual PLO by individual librarians, the PLOs are tracked on the instruction statistics log (Information Services to Groups), although not all librarians log their outcomes on this form.
Proposed:
Program Review – Library Section:
At the beginning of fall quarter, the library will send each program that is going through the program review process:
Information about current physical and digital library resources, including collection age and usage data
Information about new resources for possible acquisition
During late fall or winter quarter, program faculty will meet with a librarian to discuss the collection, library services, and information literacy instruction. This meeting will be used to answer the following questions in the program review document:
Do library resources and services meet program needs?
What resources should be removed from the library collection?
What additional library resources are needed to support students and faculty?
What information literacy instruction exists within the program? Are there opportunities for library partnerships or support?